Skip to main content

Opinions of four key groups of stakeholders on Refugees in Bangladesh

Opinions of four key groups of stakeholders on Human Security of Refugees in Bangladesh

Humanitarian Staffs

The findings from humanitarian stuff cover four main themes: violence, healthcare, livelihood, and social support.

Violence: All of the humanitarian staff responded affirmatively when asked whether Rohingya refugees face these issues, stressing the structure of their lives in camps. A health professional from Ukhia Camp 12 suggested that it is as though part of their daily lives.

The humanitarian stuffs reported that the relations between the Rohingya refugees and the local people are antagonistic overall, as the local people have struggled since the influx. An overseer of security and relief division of an international organization stressed this point. However, some Rohingya respondents from Balukhali camp claimed that they ‘love Bengali people’. However, I am unsure whether this was under duress or this is how they actually feel about it.

On the issue of security in the camps, according to some staff members, the Bangladesh government wanted to deploy military forces, but donors and international organizations prevented them from doing so. Some staff members and Rohingya respondents stressed the need for more security, especially between the designated security checkup points and humanitarian offices, as many women staff members and other staff members talked about their vulnerability. However, other respondents reported that any increase in security forces would not actually improve the situation, as they claimed that security forces either are complicit with illegal activities or simply do not want to put their lives at risk. They also mentioned the increase in ‘crime and murders’ in the past couple of years.

Healthcare: The author also found that healthcare services are inadequate and underfunded in the camps. The issue of funding was brought up by many staff members, who said that the funding has been decreasing and they were paid less than previously. The health professional from Ukhia Camp 12 said that she was not looking to continue her service as they were being contracted for only three months. She also stressed the lack of staffing and security in the camps.

The social support is rather a secondary form of need for most refugees and most need direct health intervention. The staff at camp 12 stated that mostly, social and psychological support is provided to those who have undergone severe trauma. They have mechanisms and systems in place for one-to-one counselling and other supports. They also said that they have been reporting their needs to the donors at this time.

Livelihood: The research found that livelihood programs are taking on speed in the camps, and the UN has provided many livelihood opportunities for women, including sewing training, making of plastic bags, and electrical wiring training to a specific age of the population. A respondent claimed that the Livelihood program at the UN camp 10 was a big success, according to an interview, which is being replicated into other camps and also had relative success in camp-4. Many camps are also taking initiative at this. However, most of the data suggest that these programs are primarily relegated to mostly young people and women.

The research also found that some refugees still find a way to illicitly go outside the camp to find livelihood. Some are related to drugs, which supposedly gets them quite a lot of money than other jobs. These are also people of that age who are mostly not focused on Livelihood programs. The overseer of security and relief division of an international organization pointed out that they are the ones who might choose to stay in Bangladesh, as they have found illicit means of income and do not share the goodwill of the community as a whole. He further claimed that they are in good communication with the ‘majhis’, who are the leaders of Rohingya community in the camps.

Long-term solutions: The research found that the prospects of long-term solutions for the Rohingya refugees are bleak and uncertain. When asked how hopeful they are that Rohingya refugees will find long-term solutions soon, a healthcare professional from pointed out that it depends on the cohesion of the Rohingya community. A Rohingya respondent from Balukhali camp answered in a similar manner, saying that it depends on the cohesion of the Rohingya community.

 

All the humanitarian staff claimed that it is part of their mandate to hold meetings and include the voices of the Rohingya refugees. However, this is in contrast with the Rohingya respondents from Balukhali camp, some of whom being volunteers, stressed that they were ‘under-violence’ from their own community structure, which bars them from engaging in a free manner that would be beneficial to them.

Policymakers and Academia

When asked about violence all opinioned that violence is a daily occurrence in the Rohingya camps, affecting the well-being and resilience of the refugees. The main perpetrators of violence are groups which often use children, abduct humanitarian workers, and engage in illegal activities. According to an administrative official of an international organization, all children in households have experienced or witnessed violence and shared a story about how a child was abducted from child center of their humanitarian organization because his of his father’s rivalry with gangs. The official also mentioned that one of the growing problems is that these groups forcibly take away vests of humanitarian workers, often at gunpoint, and use them for other illegal activities, such as avoiding checkpoints, fighting each other, or smuggling and trafficking. This brings a bad reputation for the organization and puts the humanitarian workers at risk.

 

Health care services are relatively good and accessible in the camps, as per report, but there are some barriers and problems that prevent the refugees from receiving adequate and quality health care. One of the main issues mentioned by a high official is that after the menstruation of adolescent girls, or as Rohingyas call it ‘urna newa’, they stop coming to school and do not seek any medical assistance. This indicates a lack of awareness and education about reproductive health and hygiene, as well as a possible stigma or taboo associated with menstruation. Another issue is the lack of specialized services for mental health, which is a crucial need for the refugees who have experienced trauma, violence, and displacement. A third issue is the shortage of medicines and equipment, which limits the capacity and effectiveness of the health care providers.

 

Repatriation to Myanmar is the paramount interest and priority of the Bangladesh government, as per interview, but the prospects are bleak due to the inappropriate conditions and security risks in Myanmar. A high official of the government reported that there was a visit from the UNHCR about the possible relocation site in Myanmar in April and August 2023, but the site seemed unsuitable and unsafe for the refugees. The official claims that the Bangladesh government is committed to repatriate the Rohingya under the purview of international law and regulations, and with the involvement of the UNHCR and other international actors.

 

The relations between the Rohingya refugees and the host communities in Bangladesh are complex and ambivalent. On one hand, there are some instances of intermarriage, trade, and cooperation between the two groups, which indicate a degree of integration and acceptance. On the other hand, there are also tensions, conflicts, and resentment, fueled by the competition for resources, the perception of injustice, and the involvement of criminal elements.

There are signs of deterioration of social fabric at camps, which affect the dignity and self-reliance of the refugees. One of the interviewees mentioned that they have found out that someone sold their baby for 26000 BDT, which is a shocking and heartbreaking example of the desperation and exploitation that some refugees face. The interviewee also mentioned that teens are engaged in subversive activities, some even have access to firearms, and that there is an open culture of not saying ‘no’ when asked, as that would result in direct detriment of the teens’ well-being. Adultery is a very common phenomenon in the camp, and often many children are left on their own.

One of the interviewees remarked that it is very common for local people to have a wife in the camp, although the marriage between the local and the Rohingya is illegal. The interviewee further remarked that this has possible links with the forging of illegal documentation, the movement of Rohingya women outside of the camp, and the exploitation of the women. Another interviewee mentioned that some people of the local populace are severely affected by the presence of a large number of refugees, who have increased the demand and prices of goods and services, and have encroached on the land and environment of the host communities.

 

Social and psychological support are available in the camps, but they are rarely sought or utilized by the refugees, who prefer to rely on their own coping mechanisms. One high-level official International organization suggested that the camps are equipped with health officials and humanitarian actors who are proficient in providing social and psychological support, but they are rarely approached by the refugees. The official attributed this to the lack of awareness and the stigma attached to mental health issues among the refugees, who may not recognize or admit their need for such support.

 

The ability of the Rohingya refugees to make decisions with dignity and self-reliance is affected by several factors, such as the lack of legal status, the restrictions on movement and work, the dependency on humanitarian aid, the insecurity and violence, and the uncertainty and hopelessness about the future. These factors also affect the interventions and strategies of the humanitarian actors, who face challenges and opportunities for improving the livelihoods and income of the refugees, such as the provision of skills training, cash assistance, and income-generating activities. One of the interviewees mentioned that there are some initiatives to provide skills training and cash assistance to the refugees, but they are limited and insufficient to meet the demand and the potential of the refugees. Another interviewee mentioned that there are some income-generating activities in the camps,mentioning- tailoring, handicrafts, and shops, but they are not sufficient. Overall opinion on Livelihood programs form respondents suggests that they are a success as more regulated and livelihood projects are being taken.

 

The relationship between the Security force and the refugee camps is a challenge. A interviewee opined that more security is needed in the camps and that the existing security officers are ‘super inactive’ and need proper training. The interviewee also claimed that there is a thin line between smuggling and trafficking, and that often the refugees are confused or coerced by the smugglers or traffickers, who promise them a better life in other countries. The interviewee recounted 29 refugees were caught going to Malaysia the previous month, and that there is another issue of abducting local population and humanitarian workers for ransom. The interviewee suggested that there is a need to improve the accountability and transparency of the security forces, as well as to enhance the protection and empowerment of the refugees.

The unanimous answer for the best long-term solution for the Rohingya refugees is repatriation to Myanmar, but this requires the improvement of the political, social, and economic conditions in Myanmar, as well as the guarantee of the rights, safety, and dignity of the Rohingya people. The interviewees expressed their pessimism and frustration about the possibility of a long-term solution, and called for more international pressure and support to resolve the crisis.

The Rohingya

 

The findings and discussion based on the answers from five respondents who live in Balukhali Camp in Bangladesh.

Education: All respondents reported that they have received some education in the camps up to 7th to 9th grade. However, they also expressed that there is no work for them. Some of them said that they love Bangladesh and appreciate the support they receive from the host country and the humanitarian organizations.

Health care: The respondents did not mention much about the health care services that they get in the camps, except for one who said that he had to be secretive to get treatment for his injuries after being beaten up by a group of people in the camp. He also said that he did not report the incident to the security forces as he did not trust them.

Decision-making: The respondents said that they have to take their family into consideration before making any decisions, especially when they are in trouble. They also said that they often have to be part of a group in the camp to be safe. They indicated that there are groups in the camps that are involved in violence and extortion, hinting that the security forces is complicit with them. Additionally, they have to take part in guarding the camp with the security forces, but they did not specify which security forces they meant. This implies that there may be a lack of participation, representation, and accountability in the decision-making processes that affect them.

Relations with locals: The respondents said that the relations between them and the local people in Bangladesh have deteriorated since 2020. They said that there is more fear and suspicion, and that they are ‘under violence’. They indicated that there is a lack of social cohesion and barrier between the refugees and the host community.

Psychological support: The respondents did not mention any specific ways of social and psychological support that they get in the camps. One respondent reported to being depressed and expressed his frustration for being seen as suspicious for working with a humanitarian organization. He also said that he has nightmares and flashbacks of the violence that he witnessed in Myanmar and on his way to Bangladesh.

Livelihoods: All the respondents have previously served in various humanitarian organization except for one who mentioned the organization in which he worked doesn’t operate there anymore. They mentioned many challenges or opportunities for improving their economic situation as they face restrictions and barriers in accessing the formal labor market and other income-generating activities.

Hopes for the future: The respondents said that they want to go back to Myanmar, even if there are better opportunities in Bangladesh. They also said ultimately it depends on the cohesion of the Rohingya group themselves whether they will be able to go back or not.

The Locals

The local population in and around the Rohingya refugee camps are aware of the violence, harassment, and discrimination that the refugees face inside and outside the camps. They reported that dangerous gangs operate in the area and they have to be very careful in speaking against them. They also claimed that the security forces are complicit with many illegal activities. They expressed disgruntlement and anger toward the forces for not being able to stop the drug and other problems.

The local population also showed a general disinterest or lack of knowledge about the health care, social and psychological support, decision-making, and livelihoods of the refugees. They assumed that the refugees receive some kind of medical assistance, but did not know the details or the barriers they face. They did not think that the refugees have a say in the decision-making processes or make decisions with dignity and self-reliance. Furthermore, 4 out of the 5 respondents were further unaware that, many livelihood opportunities exist for local population.

The local population had mixed opinions about the relations between the refugees and the host communities. Some said that the refugees are well-off and have access to things that the locals cannot afford, as as one respondent claimed that he have seen 50000 taka t-shirts in shops in designated camp zone and big festive weddings of Rohingya that they are not able to afford. He attributed this to the existence of a drug economy in the camps. They also said that the refugees steal their work and claimed even if we search now we would find many Rohingya roaming freely and working. They opinionated that they want the refugees to go back to Myanmar as soon as possible.

The local population unanimously agreed that the best long-term solution for the refugees is repatriation to Myanmar. They did not show any possibility or desire for integration in Bangladesh. They hoped that the government would send them back and provide more support and security for the locals.

Popular posts from this blog

DOES HUMAN SECURITY BRING ANYTHING NEW TO REFUEE PROTECTION?

DOES HUMAN SECURITY(HS) BRING ANYTHING NEW TO REFUEE PROTECTION? A salient question in the search for meaning for physical security that has reoriented or at least given preponderance to HS since the Cold War was “Whose security?”. This is a question that has been asked repeatedly in security discourse. However, the previous realist assertion was no longer viable in the century to come. The reorientation of security was in some sense necessary at that time, at least to rub along with the democratic consensus to cut down funding for physical security. A shift in orientation from state to individual or community, at least in normative advocacy, seemed to make up for the vacuum (Paris, 2001). Although in reality all this normative advocacy made little sense in policy application, David Chandler opinioned that human security as a concept did not ‘bark’ (Chandler, 2008). Its natural progression of time reached its end. Such was the lifetime of a neologism. However, it is my opinion that H...

Who are the Rohingya? Contested claims of their origin.

  WHO ARE THE ROHINGYA? T he question is simple, but answering it is complex. The Rohingya are an ethnic, religious, and linguistic minority group from the northern Rakhine state (Harvard Divinity School, 2021). They are distinct from the major Burman group and share cultural traits that are more similar to those of South Asia (Matisoff, 2023). The Rohingya are predominantly Muslims who claim to be the descendants of Indo-Aryans but assert their indigeneity to western Myanmar, having lived there since precolonial times (Blakemore, 2019). However, their origin and identity are highly debated among scholars. C. R. Abrar citing Nicolaus (1995) argues that the influx of Muslim traders from Afghanistan, India, Persia, Turkey, and the Arabian Peninsula merged with the previous Muslim community to form the Rohingya community, which brought about a distinct dialect known as the Rohingya language. It is worth mentioning that the Rohingya language shares similarities with the C...

THE ASIAN LABORATORY OF HUMAN SECURITY AND REFUGEES

  THE ASIAN LABORATORY OF HUMAN SECURITY AND REFUGEES The 21st century has the potential to be recognized as the era dominated by Asian influence and achievements, especially in terms of Human Security (HS) (Kim, 2010). HS has an Asian origin, as evidenced by the prominent role of Japan in advancing a HS agenda of ‘freedom from want’ that transcends the state-centric approach and prioritizes the well-being of individuals (Acharya, 2001). In addition, influential scholars such as Mahbubul Haq and Amartya Sen, have Asian roots, and along with many other Asian academics who have contributed to shaping a distinctive Asian perspective on HS. The Asian view of HS differs from the allegedly narrow Westphalian view that focuses on the physical securitization of states. This view puts a premium on the principles of sovereignty and noninterference. However, as Kim stresses, these principles are not new or uniquely Asian (Kim, 2010). What is new is how the international system has changed...